ARTEMIS-5972: Replace JNI with Panama Foreign Function & Memory (FFM)…#6444
ARTEMIS-5972: Replace JNI with Panama Foreign Function & Memory (FFM)…#6444mayankkunwar wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
nice one @mayankkunwar |
mayankkunwar
force-pushed
the
ARTEMIS-5972
branch
2 times, most recently
from
17ca830 to
758dfd6
Compare
mayankkunwar
force-pushed
the
ARTEMIS-5972
branch
8 times, most recently
from
a91e37f to
f177963
Compare
mayankkunwar
force-pushed
the
ARTEMIS-5972
branch
from
f177963 to
68f5845
Compare
mayankkunwar
force-pushed
the
ARTEMIS-5972
branch
from
68f5845 to
fb9503f
Compare
mayankkunwar
force-pushed
the
ARTEMIS-5972
branch
7 times, most recently
from
8ddbb55 to
8bcceee
Compare
mayankkunwar
force-pushed
the
ARTEMIS-5972
branch
4 times, most recently
from
bda5293 to
fbd575c
Compare
mayankkunwar
force-pushed
the
ARTEMIS-5972
branch
10 times, most recently
from
b602e56 to
9fc249c
Compare
clebertsuconic
force-pushed
the
ARTEMIS-5972
branch
2 times, most recently
from
beabca5 to
a89db8c
Compare
mayankkunwar
force-pushed
the
ARTEMIS-5972
branch
6 times, most recently
from
017c72c to
571ebec
Compare
| </build> | ||
|
|
||
| <profiles> | ||
| <profile> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Now that you made the optional compilation in the ffm module, this could always be present, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I just need to link artemis-ffm changes to artemis-journal, and after that we can always have it.
| </activation> | ||
| <dependencies> | ||
| <dependency> | ||
| <groupId>org.apache.artemis</groupId> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this could always be present?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, let me push the linking part to artemis-journal, and after this we can.
| <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId> | ||
| <executions> | ||
| <execution> | ||
| <id>java24-compile</id> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
do we still need this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, we will need this as latest changes has FFM related component like MemorySegment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what if we changed the signature to use ByteBuffer (at least what's exposed to this level?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
actually.. never mind... the implementation of the SequentialFactory itself is dependent on other internal parts. I think we need it.
| <build> | ||
| <plugins> | ||
| <plugin> | ||
| <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
do we still need this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess for this case we do, but just double checking with you.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, we will need this part as well
|
having the optional compilation in FFM simplifies thing a lot... nice one |
mayankkunwar
force-pushed
the
ARTEMIS-5972
branch
5 times, most recently
from
18075b2 to
5c113de
Compare
…, which is now introducing libaio. In the configuration we are naming it as ASYNCIO_2. Co-Authored-By: Clebert Suconic <clebertsuconic@apache.org>
mayankkunwar
force-pushed
the
ARTEMIS-5972
branch
from
5c113de to
dd41139
Compare
3 participants
… API for Journal Native Layer